Thursday, June 10, 2010

The great iPhone vs Android debate

I've been feeling the need to write this blog entry for some time. I don't blog about much these days - Twitter is so much easier; but trying to say what I want to say in 140 characters is not quite possible.

Let me be clear - I don't hate Apple and I don't think iPhones are rubbish. Yes, there are things I dislike about Apple's way of doing things, but equally they do a lot of things very, very well - the iPhone is a good example of this.

However, since getting my Android phone I have encountered an awful lot of myths about Android, both implicit and explicit, among iPhone users, and I feel compelled to try and dispel/counter them as best I can.

I guess the fact that I am the only person amongst my work colleagues with an Android phone while the vast majority have iPhones, iPods and Macs of various descriptions means there is an inevitable bias towards Apple products, along with the fact that I've always been the sort of person to side with the underdog rather than jump on the bandwagon, tends to get me more worked up than I might otherwise be in a different environment, but nevertheless, I want to try and keep a level head and be reasonable and balanced in what I say.

There are a number of perceptions of Android (the operating system itself and Android phones more generally) that crop up repeatedly:

Android is geeky
Of course, there's nothing wrong with being geeky. But quite where this idea comes from I'm not sure. Well, I have an idea. It's partly the name 'Android' which obviously has a rather techy, geeky, Trekky kind of sound to it - clearly that means nothing, but it may have contributed to the perception to some extent. Partly its the fact that Android is open source and therefore has quite a techy community around it, coupled with the fact that early versions of the OS were still fairly 'beta' compared to the iPhone which came onto the market as a fully finished, packaged product. The situation today is quite different. Yes, Android is still open source, and there is still a large techy community around it, but the OS is no longer anything like beta and can hold its own against the iPhone OS any day, if not surpassing it in some areas. Also, the early adopters of Android did tend to be the geekier types - simply because of the open source, beta thing. But that doesn't mean it's geared towards geeks, or that it is better suited to geeks. Yes, geeky types may well find Android more appealing because of the fact they can play around with the code etc in a way they can't with the iPhone, but that isn't a reflection on the OS as a whole.

iPhones just work
The implication of course is that Android phones require more time and effort to set up, configure and generally use. I can say quite categorically that my HTC Desire couldn't have been simper to set up, configure and start using. I took it out the box, pressed the power button, it asked me to enter my Google, Twitter, Facebook and Flickr usernames and passwords, and that was that, done, ready to go. There was literally nothing else to do.

Now obviously there are plenty of options and settings if you really want to get stuck in and customise the phone. Although to be honest, even as someone who quite enjoys that sort of thing, I've not found the need to as everything works so well already. But I like the fact that the options are there should I decide I want to change something - they're there but don't get in the way, which is key. I sometimes hear the argument that giving people too many options is a bad thing. It's only bad if you force them on the user and confuse them. With Android, the options are there, but if you're not into that sort of thing you can completely ignore them and get on with your life - in fact you don't even need to know they're there.

There are more apps for the iPhone
True, but there are also over 50,000 apps for Android. There are plenty of pointless apps for iPhone just as there are for Android. Most worthwhile apps are available for both, and in fact Android has some notable apps that are not and probably never will be available for iPhone (Google Nav for example).

More apps doesn't therefore necessarily equate to better, and anyway, as Android grows in market share the number of apps is increasing exponentially.

More people use iPhones than Android
The gap is closing fast, actually. But regardless, this in itself means very little. Android was launched later than iPhone, and has taken some time to get to the point where it is mature enough for operators and phone manufacturers to embrace it. Things are changing apace now though, with new Android phones being announced almost weekly. There are also moves to use the Android OS in other applications like cars and household appliances.

No-one cares about 'openness'
One of the things touted by some Android users over iPhone is the fact that its an 'open' system - open source, not controlled tightly by Google in the way iPhone is by Apple. Anyone can develop apps for Android without having to get them approved. This IS a good thing in many ways (although there are obviously advantages with the iPhone approach as well). It's true that on the face of it, the Jo Public doesn't care whether the OS is open source or not, so its not an argument one way or the other really.

Multitasking is bad
iPhone 4 will have multitasking so this is a bit of an old one now. However, there are still myths about this - Steve Jobs even misquoted Larry Page recently saying that some apps can cause battery drain because they don't work well with multitasking. This has been taken by many pro-Apple bloggers to be an admission that multitasking in Android is somehow not up to par, but in fact it was simply an acknowledgement that there are some sub-par apps out there that haven't been built to play nicely with the multitasking environment. That's certainly no indictment of multitasking, but only of those apps.

The reality is that multitasking in Android works absolutely fine. It isn't complicated or geeky in any way shape or form - just as its not on a desktop computer.


I've not covered all the arguments here by any means and this isn't meant to be exhaustive or a proper side by side comparison or anything like that - just addressing some of the common arguments against Android. Doubtless this will generate a veritable storm of comments on Twitter!

One last thing... does it matter? No! There are far more important things to worry about in life.

No comments: